Rebuild by Design Meadowlands
Documents/Resources
The Rebuild By Design Meadowlands process has produced numerous documents reports, etc. associated with construction, environmental impact, disaster recovery, and more. See below for more. Click here to learn about upcoming public meetings & construction.
Final Environmental Impact Statement
- FEIS Abstract Cover Page
- Download 1
- Title, Executive Summary, Table of Contents
- Acronyms and Abbreviations
- Chapter 1 | Introduction and Statement of Purpose and Need
- Chapter 2 | Proposed Project Alternatives
- Chapter 3 | Affected Environment
- Download 2
- Chapter 4 | Environmental Consequences
- Chapter 5 | Cumulative Impacts
- Chapter 6 | Other Required Disclosures
- Chapter 7 | List of Preparers
- Chapter 8 | References
- Chapter 9 | Glossary
- Chapter 10 | List of Stakeholders
- Chapter 11 | Comments and Responses to Comments on the DEIS
- Appendices
- Download 3
- Appendix A: Agency and Stakeholder Correspondence
- Appendix B: Compliance with Federal, State, and Local Laws and Regulations
- Appendix C: Projects Considered for the Cumulative Effects Analysis
- Appendix D: Additional Data on EJ Communities of Concern in the Project Area
- Appendix E: Cultural and Historical Resources
- Download 4
- Appendix F: Transportation Technical Memorandum and Supporting Documentation
- Appendix G: Noise and Vibration Analysis Support Data
- Download 5
- Appendix H: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Appendix I: Sediment Scour and Deposition Analysis
- Appendix J: Biological Resources Survey Report
- Appendix K: Geology and Soil
- Appendix L: Wetlands and Waters of the US
- Appendix M: Coastal Zone Management
- Appendix N: Hazards and Hazardous Materials
- Appendix O: HUD Acceptable Separation Distance Technical Report
- Appendix P: Public Comment Summary Report
- Appendix Q: Essential Fish Habitat Assessment Report
- Download 3
Notifications
- Record of Decision [pdf]
Final Feasibility Study (FS)
- Table of Contents
-
- Acronyms and Abbreviations
- Executive Summary
- 1.0 Introduction
- 2.0 Background
- 3.0 Existing Conditions
- 4.0 Future Conditions with No Action Alternative
- 5.0 Plan Development Approach
- 6.0 Alternative 1 – Plan Development
- 7.0 Alternative 2 – Plan Development
- 8.0 Alternative 3 – Plan Development
- 9.0 Comparison of Alternatives – Selection of Build Plan
- 10.0 Alternative 3 Build Plan Description
- 11.0 Build Plan Implementation
- 12.0 References
-
- Appendices
- Appendix A – Data Collection and Review
- Subappendix A1 – Geographic Information System Index
- Subappendix A2 – Shorefront Structures Survey
- Subappendix A3 – Survey Data and Coordination Support
- Subappendix A4 – Detailed Survey
- Subappendix A4-1 – Locations with Storm Drainage Related Issues
- Subappendix A4-2 – Existing Condition Data for Pump Stations and Tide Gates
- Subappendix A4-3 – Historical Drainage Studies at Teterboro Airport
- Appendix B – Storm Surge and Flood Risk Models
- Subappendix B1 – Coastal Flood Risk Model
- Subappendix B2 – Hydrology and Rainfall-Tide Correlation Analysis
- Subappendix B3 – Interior Drainage Analysis for Alternative 1
- Subappendix B4 – Integrated Modeling Approach
- Subappendix B5 – Drainage Capacity Evaluation Criteria
- Subappendix B6 – Preliminary Screening Hydraulic Modeling Report
- Subappendix B7 – HEC-RAS Detailed Modeling Summary
- Subappendix B8 – InfoWorks Modeling Data, Methods, and Results
- Subappendix B9 – Global Climate Change and Sea Level Change
- Subappendix B10 – Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 Model Output (output is approximately 5 Gb and is available upon request)
- Appendix C – Design
- Subappendix C1 – Geotechnical Analysis
- Subappendix C2 – Structural Analysis
- Subappendix C3 – Berry’s Creek Surge Barrier Design
- Appendix D – Cost
- Appendix E – Benefits
- Appendix F – Alternatives Development and Screening
- Subappendix F1 – Alternative 1 Development and Screening
- Subappendix F2 – Alternative 2 Development and Screening
- Subappendix F3 – Alternative 3 Development and Screening
- Subappendix F4 – Alternative Plans
- Subappendix F4-1: Alternative 1 Plan Set
- Subappendix F4-2: Alternative 2 Plan Set
- Subappendix F4-3: Alternative 3 Plan Set
- Subappendix F4-4: Alternative 3 Build Plan Set
- Subappendix F4-5: Feasibility Concept Plan Sets
- Subappendix F5 – Typical Sections and Kit of Parts
- Subappendix F6 – Utility Conflict Evaluation for Alternative 2
- Appendix G – Real Estate
- Appendix A – Data Collection and Review
- May 12, 2021: Rebuild By Design – Meadowlands Project – Virtual Public Meeting
- Complete Presentation
- Meeting Video [YouTube]
- March 11, 2020: Rebuild By Design – Meadowlands Project – Public Meeting
- July 6, 2016: Rebuild By Design – Meadowlands Project – Public Scoping Meeting
- Slide Presentation [pdf]
- Full Video Recording of Presentation/Speakers [youtube]
- Meeting Handouts – FAQs English | Spanish | Korean
- Breakout Sessions – Presentation Boards
- NEPA Timeline English | Spanish | Korean
- NEPA Purpose and Need English | Spanish | Korean
- NEPA Outreach Process English | Spanish | Korean
- NEPA Project Area English | Spanish | Korean
- NEPA Existing Water-Related Infrastructure English | Spanish | Korean
- NEPA Current Problem Flooding Areas English | Spanish | Korean
- NEPA Hazardous Materials English | Spanish | Korean
- NEPA Wetlands + Mitigation Banks English | Spanish | Korean
- None at this time.
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter February 2019
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter October 2018
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter June 2018
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter January 2018
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter December 2017
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter November 2017
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter October 2017
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter July 2017
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter June 2017
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter May 2017
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter April 2017
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter March 2017
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter February 2017
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter January 2017
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter December 2016
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter November 2016
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter October 2016
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter September 2016
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter August 2016
- Rebuild by Design Meadowlands – Newsletter July 2016
- A Notice of Intent (NOI) To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Rebuild by Design Meadowlands Flood Protection Project is published in the Federal Register.
- Click here to view a pdf of the Federal Register Notice.
- Notice of Intent English | Spanish | Korean
- Read the newspaper published version which includes the Notice of Early Public Review of a Proposed Activity in a 100-year Floodplain and Wetlands for the Rebuild by Design Meadowlands Flood Protection Project
- Guidance for Public Involvement
For older documents, here for the RBDM Archive
June 26, 2018 – Draft Environmental Impact Statement Hearing
- Public hearing handout (pdf) English | Español | Korean
- DEIS Powerpoint presentation
- DEIS Presentation Video (YouTube)
January 23, 2020 – Riverfront Park Design Workshop
- Presentation
- Display Boards (forthcoming)
- January 11, 2018 – Project Update on Preferred Alternative and Build Plan
- 1/11/18 – Video Recording of the Community Meeting [YouTube]
- 1/11/18 – Community Meeting Presentation
- 1/11/18 – Community Meeting Handout
- 1/11/18 – Meeting Flyer
- 1/11/18 – Final Meeting Notes
- October 28, 2020 – Final CAG meeting presentation
- October 17, 2017 – Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #11
- June 27, 2017 – Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #10 / Alternative 3: Hybrid Alternative
- May 24, 2017 – Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #9 / Environmental Impact Process with a focus on Biological Resources
- March 29, 2017 – Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #8 / Alternative 1: Structural Flood Risk Reduction and Alternative 3: Hybrid
- January 31, 2017 – Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #7 / Alternative 2: Stormwater Drainage Improvements
- December 6, 2016 – Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #6 / Alternative 1: Structural Flood Reduction Concept Development
- October 24, 2016 – Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #5 / Ecology and Drainage Basin Opportunity Areas
- September 20, 2016 – Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #4 / Concept Component Development Workshop
- August 11, 2016 – Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #3
- May 17, 2016 – Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #2B
- April 26, 2016 – Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #2A / Community Workshop
- March 23, 2016 – Citizen Advisory Group Meeting
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) as part of the Meadowlands Rebuild By Design (RBD) project has sent Cooperating Agency letters to several State and Federal agencies. These Cooperating Agency letters are sent to formalize the agreement between the NJDEP and the individual State or Federal agencies with regards to this project.
These letters were sent to comply with regulations implemented by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) which mandate that the NJDEP prepare a NEPA analyses and documentation “in cooperation with Federal and State governments” and other agencies with jurisdiction by law or special expertise (42 USC §§ 4331(a) and 42 USC §§ 4332(2)).
All of the following letters were sent to agencies that the NJDEP has been and will continue to work with on the Meadowlands RBD throughout the life of the project.
- Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 2 (FEMA)
- National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) (response)
- New Jersey Transit (NJ TRANSIT) (response)
- Port Authority of New York & New Jersey (Port Authority of NY & NJ) (response)
- US Army Corps of Engineers (CoE)
- US Department of Housing & Urban Development, Regional Administrator (HUD)
- US Department of Housing & Urban Development, Director (HUD)
- US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 (EPA) (response)
- US Fish & Wildlife (FWS)
Field Work Announcement Letter
NJDEP’s consultant, AECOM, and their sub-consultants, are entering the investigative phase of this project. Therefore, you may see their field staff in the area collecting data for various studies. Each field crew will have a copy of the letter (see below) from the NJDEP explaining why they are collecting the data in the event any residents or business owners are looking for an explanation as to what the field crews are doing.
The New Jersey Department of Community Affairs (NJDCA) and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) as part of the Meadowlands Rebuild By Design (RBD) project has sent Consultation letters to the affected Native American Tribes and the New Jersey Historic Preservation Office in order to be in compliance with Section 106 of the Historic Preservation Act of 1966. This legislation requires that any federally funded project must consider its effects on historic properties, structures or objects.
Additional information regarding the Rebuild by Design competition and the design concept are available below:
Dennis Reinknecht, Director
Division of Resilience Engineering and Construction
44 S Clinton Ave
Trenton, NJ 08625
PH: 609-777-4152