tmdl gettybanner

The federal Clean Water Act requires each State to address impaired, “unhealthy” waterbodies through Total Maximum Daily Loads. TMDLs diagnose the source of the problem and quantify the water quality recovery, assisting DEP in achieving its priorities of waters that are swimmable, fishable and safe for drinking.

Pollutant sources, which are the cause of these unhealthy waters, fall into two categories – point sources and nonpoint sources.

main tmdl

Point Sources

  • Municipal wastewater treatment plant discharges
  • Industrial wastewater treatment plant discharges
  • Residential and urban storm-water runoff*

* This source could fall in either category; however, as per the Clean Water Act storm-water runoff is regulated as a point source.

Nonpoint Sources

  • Excess fertilizer from residential or agriculture run-off
  • Oil, grease and toxic chemicals from urban run-off
  • Sediment from construction sites, crop and forest land
  • Salt from irrigation or de-icing
  • Bacteria from animal waste
  • Atmospheric deposition
tmdl detail process

Waters of the state are regularly assessed to determine if surface water quality standards are met and designated uses are supported. Waters that do not meet the applicable standard(s) or support the applicable designated use(s) are placed on the 303(d) List of Water Quality Limited Waters (303(d) List), as part of New Jersey’s biennial Integrated Water Quality Assessment Report. Section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act requires development of a TMDL for the pollutant(s) causing the impairment. Impaired waters are ranked and prioritized for TMDL development as part of the development of the 303(d) List every two years.

The factors considered in TMDL ranking and prioritization are described in the Integrated Water Quality Assessment Methods. Federal regulations concerning TMDLs are contained in USEPA's Water Quality Planning and Management Regulations (40 CFR 130,7(c)). New Jersey’s rules regarding TMDLs are set forth in the Water Quality Management Planning rules at N.J.A.C. 7:15-5.

Many of the waters placed on New Jersey's 303(d) List are impaired primarily by nonpoint sources of pollution or regulated stormwater sources rather than traditional point sources. For these impairments, development of a watershed restoration plan or watershed based plan can be an effective alternative to a formal TMDL. These plans characterize pollutant sources, the reductions needed to attain standards and the means to achieve the reductions. Implementation of these plans can often be achieved through receipt of Water Quality Restoration Grants for Nonpoint Source Pollution.

A load reduction target must be established for each pollutant listed as a cause of water quality impairment on the 303(d) List. A TMDL can include multiple load reductions but a separate TMDL equation must be derived for each pollutant causing water quality impairment. TMDLs must be calculated so that surface water quality standards for each pollutant will be attained. The critical condition and seasonal variation need to be considered, plus a margin of safety (MOS) to account for uncertainty, are all part of the TMDL development. The TMDL is allocated among all of the sources of the pollutant, including point sources, nonpoint sources and natural background.

Point sources are any discernible, confined, and/or discrete conveyance from which pollutants are or may be discharged, such as wastewater treatment facilities, combined sewer overflows and/or stormwater. All point sources receive wasteload allocations (WLAs) as part of the TMDL.

Nonpoint sources (NPS) of pollution are diffuse sources, such as overland runoff and air deposition, other than a point source from which pollutants are or may be discharged or harbor other activity that contributes or may contribute to water pollution. NPS receive Load Allocations (LAs) as part of the TMDL.

A Margin of Safety (MOS) is also required as part of the TMDL but it can be expressed as either an explicit part of the TMDL equation or may be accounted for through conservative assumptions made in calculating the TMDL. Reserve Capacity is an optional TMDL component included as a pollutant load for later allocation.


TMDL Equation:

Total Maximum Daily Load = LAs + WLAs+ MOS + RC*

WHERE:
LA = Load allocations from nonpoint sources
WLA = Waste load allocations from point sources
MOS = Margin of saftey to account for scientific uncertainty
*RC = Reserve capacity set aside for future development (optional TMDL component)

Mathematical models are used to simulate water quality conditions throughout the impaired waterbody and its watershed, including the sources of pollutants, the relationship between pollutant loading and the water chemistry and other environmental responses resulting in water quality impairment. The model is also used to evaluate pollutant reduction scenarios and waterbody response to these scenarios. The selection and application of an appropriate model leads to scientifically-defensible, TMDL-assigned pollutant reductions. There are different types of mathematical models that vary in the level of complexity:

Simple models calculate the percent reduction of pollutants neccessary to meet Surface Water Quality Standards without a need to mimic pollutant changes in the environment and are sometimes adequate for a TMDL.

Complex models can simulate changes in pollutant concentrations and flow in the contributing drainage area. Pollutant transformation and relationships to other pollutants in the area are often mimicked in complex water quality modeling.

tmdl model

The figure below shows an example of a (complex) model calibration figure for in-stream dissoved oxygen from the Raritan River TMDL technical report (Kleinfelder/Omni 2013, Vol. 3, pg. K-20 )
tmdl 2 charts

  • Verify the water quality impairment

  • Analyze water quality data in the watershed

  • Collect additional data if needed (e.g. stream water quality data, stream characteristic measurements, weather data, etc.)

  • Present information on water quality impairment and seek input from stakeholders

  • Construct and test the TMDL model

  • When there is a good model fit, run the TMDL model for different pollutant reduction scenarios

  • Select appropriate reductions to meet the water quality standard under modeled critical waterbody conditions

  • Convene a Model Evaluation Group appropriate to review complex models to vet that constructed/validated models are ready for TMDL proposal

  • Propose TMDL to the Water Quality Management Plan

  • Public review of proposed TMDL report

  • Submit final TMDLs to USEPA for approval

  • Adopt TMDL as a Water Quality Management Plan amendment

  • Implement TMDLs through New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit revisions and grant restoration projects

  • A TMDL is "proposed" when DEP publishes the TMDL Report as a proposed Water Quality Management Plan amendment in the New Jersey Register for public review and comment in accordance with N.J.A.C. 7:15-3.4

  • Following the public comment period, DEP prepares a response to comments and minor revisions to the TMDL

  • The revised document with response to comments is “established” upon submittal to EPA for review

  • Following EPA’s review and approval process, the TMDL is deemed “approved.” DEP can then implement the TMDL and it can proceed to be “adopted” as an amendment to the Water Quality Management Plan, in accordance with N.J.A.C. 7:15-3.4

  • The Notice of Adoption is published in the New Jersey Register

There are various informed opportunities during the development of a TMDL for public participation. Public meetings may be held to present information and solicit feedback. Additionally, formal public comments are sought when a TMDL is proposed - either in person at a hearing, in writing or both.

To stay up to date on public meetings join our DEP Email List and select WRM-Water Quality Assessment/Standards/Total Maximum Daily Loads.

Public participation, by stakeholders, is a valuable part of TMDL development and can be beneficial at various stages throughout the process. For example, local knowledge of water quality conditions and/or potential pollutant sources can influence TMDL monitoring designs. In addition, local water monitoring data can assist in developing a more accurate water quality model. Stakeholder input during the TMDL publication phase can help refine the final report as well as identify appropriate fixes to improve and restore water quality.

Over 600 TMDLs are covered in 50 TMDL documents that have been developed in New Jersey. The pollutants addressed by these TMDLs include pathogens, total phosphorus, mercury, PCBs, and various other pollutants described below and in the New Jersey TMDL List.

The top ten causes of water quality impairment in 2020 are shown in the chart below. Of all causes of impairments, five of the top ten are associated with the aquatic life designated use, including total phosphorus. TMDLs have been established for 68% of the pathogens, 65% of the mercury and 41% of the total phosphorus causing impairment.

Pathogen TMDLs have been developed for most of the watersheds assessed as not supporting the shellfish harvest for consumption use (79%). See the maps below for additional information.

tmdl map1 small tmdl map3 small tmdl arsenicmap small

tmdl phosmap1 tmdls map2 small

Click on map to enlarge
poll chart *Footnote: Use impairment is explained further HERE.

To find out what TMDLs are in your area use the TMDL look-up tool and enter the county and municipality of interest.

To view a map of areas covered by a TMDL use the DEP’s NJ-GeoWeb. Select the “TMDL” layers found in the table of contents.

DEP also provides TMDL shapefiles for download from the NJDEP Open Data (arcgis.com). Select the appropriate layer available in the dropdown on DEP Digital Data Downloads in ArcGIS Shape file format.

A TMDL Look-Up Tool is also available that allows the user to quickly identify if an approved TMDL is associated with surface waters within or bordering their municipality. This tool was developed to help municipal stormwater coordinators implement requirements of municipal separate storm sewer (MS4) permits but may be used by anyone with an interest in water quality in New Jersey.

Watershed Based Plans

Watershed-based planning helps address water quality problems in a holistic manner by fully assessing the contributing causes and sources of pollution, then prioritizing restoration and protection strategies to address these problems. Beginning in State Fiscal Year (SFY) 2006, the Department supported development of Watershed Restoration and Protection Plans, also referred to as Watershed-Based Plans (WBPs), that focused on reducing nonpoint sources (NPS) of water pollution.

Designated use impairments caused by a parameter associated with NPS pollution that is addressed under one of these approved WBPs are identified on Subpart 5R of the Integrated List. Subpart 5R identifies use impairment caused primarily by NPS pollution or stormwater runoff that is not regulated under the federal CWA and is most effectively addressed through source controls rather than TMDLs. Watershed restoration plans, including 319(h) funded WBPs, can be an effective alternative to a formal TMDL to characterize pollutant sources, the reductions needed to attain standards, and the means to achieve the reductions. Technical guidance and related documents are available under Technical Support Documents.

  1. Identify causes and sources of pollution
  2. Estimate pollutant loading into the watershed and the expected load reductions
  3. Describe management measures that will achieve load reductions and targeted critical areas
  4. Estimate amounts of technical and financial assistance and the relevant authorities needed to implement the plan
  5. Develop an information/education component
  6. Develop a project schedule
  7. Describe the interim, measurable milestones
  8. Identify indicators to measure progress
  9. Develop a monitoring component


  10. Additional information regarding developing a watershed-based plan can be acquired from EPA’s Handbook for Developing Watershed Plans to Restore and Protect Our Waters. Specific information, from that handbook, on the 9 elements above.

Nonpoint Source Pollution Management

Addressing nonpoint sources (NPS) is a critical piece in the restoration efforts in the State. The NPS Management Program combines regulatory controls, non-regulatory strategies, watershed-based plans, restoration actions, and targeted funding to address NPS pollution. Every five years the program’s objectives and initiatives are updated in its Program Plan.

Many of the waters placed on the 303(d) List are impaired primarily by nonpoint sources of pollution and regulated stormwater sources. For these impairments, development of a watershed restoration plan or watershed based plan (WBP) can be an effective alternative to a formal TMDL to characterize pollutant sources, the reductions needed to attain standards, and the means to achieve the reductions. The DEP has approved over twenty 9-element WBPs located throughout the state including in the Musconetcong watershed (not seen on map). These watersheds receive priority for NPS funding from the Water Quality Restoration Grant Program.

Water quality restoration grants are awarded by the DEP to fund watershed restoration activities and initiatives around New Jersey that address nonpoint source pollution. Generally, grants are focused on restoration of water quality impaired predominantly by NPS pollution for waters located in a priority waterbody or region where the grant will help implement an approved TMDL or Watershed Based Plan (WBP). Information about current and previous funding priorities, grant awards, and successful grant projects is provided in the links below.

New Jersey TMDLs

TMDL TitlesWatershed Management Area (WMA)PollutantEPA Approval
Amendment to Tri-County and Lower Delaware Water Quality Management Plans to Establish Total Maximum Daily Loads for Volatile Organic Compounds in the Delaware River17, 18, 19, 20Volatile Organic Compounds2000
Amendment to the Northeast Water Quality Management Plan to Establish a Total Maximum Daily Load for Nickel in the Hackensack River5Nickel2000
Total Maximum Daily Load for Phosphorus in the Lower Sylvan Lake, Burlington Township, Burlington County, NJ20182000
Total Maximum Daily Load For Phosphorus in Strawbridge Lake, Moorestown Township, Burlington County, NJ18Phosphorus2000
Total Maximum Daily Load for Fecal Coliform and an Interim Total Phosphorus Reduction Plan for the Whippany River Watershed6Fecal Coliform2000
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Fecal Coliform to Address 31 Streams in the Atlantic Water Region12, 13, 14, 15, 16Fecal Coliform2003
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Phosphorus To Address 4 Eutrophic Lakes in the Northwest1Phosphorus2003
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Phosphorus To Address Nine Eutrophic Lakes in the Atlantic Coastal Water Region12, 13, 14, 15, 16Phosphorus
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Phosphorus To Address 6 Eutrophic Lakes in the Raritan Water Region7, 8, 9Phosphorus2003
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Phosphorus To Address Three (3) Eutrophic Lakes in the Northeast Water RegionAdoption4, 5Phosphorus2003
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Fecal Coliform to Address 27 Streams in the Lower Delaware Water Region17, 18, 19, 20Fecal Coliform2003
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Phosphorus To Address 13 Eutrophic Lakes in the Lower Delaware Water Region17, 18, 20Phosphorus2003
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Fecal Coliform to Address 32 Streams in the Northeast Water RegionAdoption3, 4, 6Fecal Coliform2003
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Fecal Coliform to Address 28 Streams in the Northwest1, 2, 11Fecal Coliform2003
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Fecal Coliform to Address 48 Streams in the Raritan Water Region7, 8, 9, 10Fecal Coliform2003
Total Maximum Daily Load to Address Phosphorus in the Clove Acres Lake and Papakating Creek Northwest2Phosphorus2004
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Total Phosphorus To Address Four Streams Segments and Two Lakes in Cooper River Watershed, Camden County Lower Delaware Water Region18Phosphorus2004
Total Maximum Daily Load for Phosphorus To Address Greenwood Lake in the Northeast Water Region3Phosphorus2004
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Fecal Coliform to Address 3 Streams in the Atlantic Water Region12Fecal Coliform2004
Total Maximum Daily Load to Address Arsenic in the Wallkill River and Papakating Creek Northwest2Arsenic2004
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Phosphorus to Address 5 Stream Segments in the Lower Delaware Water Region17, 18, 20Phosphorus2005
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Phosphorus to Address Three (3) Stream Segments in the Northeast Water Region5Phosphorus2005
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Fecal Coliform to Address Two (2) Streams in the Atlantic Coastal Water Region12Fecal Coliform2005
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Fecal Coliform to Address Three (3) Streams in the Lower Delaware Water Region17, 18, 20Fecal Coliform2005
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Total Phosphorus To Address Two (2) Streams Segments in the Manasquan River Watershed, Monmouth County, Atlantic Coastal Water Region12Phosphorus2005
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Fecal Coliform to Address 10 Streams in the Northwest1, 11Fecal Coliform2005
TMDL to Address Temperature in the Pequannock River Northeast Water Region3Temperature2005
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Fecal Coliform to Address 2 Streams in the Northeast Water Region3, 6Fecal Coliform2005
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Fecal Coliform to Address 3 Streams in the Raritan Water Region7, 9, 10Fecal Coliform2005
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Phosphorus to Address 3 Stream Segments in the Atlantic Coastal Water Region12, 13Phosphorus2005
Total Maximum Daily Load To Address Phosphorus and Fish Community Impairments in Swartswood Lake in the Northwest1Phosphorus2005
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Phosphorus to Address Seven (7) Stream Segments in the Northwest2, 11Phosphorus2005
Five Total Maximum Daily Loads for Total Coliform to Address Shellfish-Impaired Waters in Watershed Management Area 12 Atlantic Coastal Water Region12Total Coliform2006
Fourteen Total Maximum Daily Loads for Total Coliform to Address Shellfish-Impaired Waters in Watershed Management Area 13 Atlantic Coastal Water Region13Total Coliform2006
Five Total Maximum Daily Loads for Total Coliform to Address Shellfish Impaired Waters in Watershed Management Area 14 Atlantic Coastal Water Region14Total Coliform2006
Six Total Maximum Daily Loads for Total Coliform to Address Shellfish-Impaired Waters in Watershed Management Area 15 Atlantic Coastal Water Region15Total Coliform2006
Ten Total Maximum Daily Loads for Total Coliform to Address Shellfish-Impaired Waters in Watershed Management Area 16 Atlantic Coastal Water Region16Total Coliform2006
Six Total Maximum Daily Loads for Total Coliform to Address Shellfish-Impaired Waters in Watershed Management Area 17 Lower Delaware Water Region17Total Coliform2006
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Phosphorus to Address 4 Stream Segments: Annaricken Brook, Barkers Brook North Branch and Doctors Creek20Phosphorus2007
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Pathogens to Address 18 Lakes in the Atlantic Coastal Water Region12, 13, 14, 15, 16Pathogens2007
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Pathogens to Address 4 Lakes in the Raritan Water Region8Pathogens2007
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Pathogens to Address 17 Lakes in the Lower Delaware Water Region17, 18, 19, 20Pathogens2007
Total Maximum Daily Load for Phosphorus to Address HUC 02040105240030-01 Miry Run Watershed (WMA 11) NorthwestApproval11Phosphorus2007
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Pathogens to Address 25 Lakes in the Northeast Water Region3, 4, 6Pathogens2007
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Pathogens to Address 11 Lakes in the Northwest1, 2Pathogens2007
Total Maximum Daily Load Report For the Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Addressing Phosphorus ImpairmentsTrading White PaperTrading ReportPompton.pptPassaic Phase 2 ReportPassaic Phase 2 Report AppendixWanaque Tech Report 1Wanaque Tech Report 2Wanaque.pptPassaic.ppt3, 4, 6Phosphorus2008
Total Maximum Daily Load Report to Address Phosphorus Impairment in Pompton Lake and Ramapo River in the Northeast Water RegionWanaque Res ReportWanaque Res Model3Phosphorus2008
Total Maximum Daily Load for Mercury Impairments Based on Concentration in Fish Tissue Caused Mainly by Air Deposition to Address 122 HUC 14s StatewideHg TMDL.pptAdopted 2020 AmendmentsAllMercury Impairments2009, 2011, 2020
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Phosphorus to Address Four (4) Impaired Assessment Units in the Pequest River Watershed1Phosphorus2010
Total Maximum Daily Load for the Non-Tidal Raritan River Basin Addressing Total Phosphorus, Dissolved Oxygen, pH and Total Suspended Solids Impairments for Watershed Management Areas 8, 9 and 10Phase 1 ReportPhase 2 Report 1/3Phase 2 Report 2/3Phase 2 Report 3/3Adoption8, 9, 10Total Phosphorus, Dissolved Oxygen, pH and Total Suspended Solids2016
303(d) — 303(d) List of Water Quality Limited Waters
As — Arsenic
BEARs — Bureau of Environmental Analysis, Restoration and Standards
BMP — Best Management Practice
CFR — Code of Federal Regulations
CWA — Clean Water Act
DO —Dissolved Oxygen
FC — Fecal Coliform
Hg — Mercury
HUC — Hydrologic Unit Code
HUC14 — NJ’s smallest delineated watershed/assessment unit. NJ has 958 HUC14s labeled using a 14-digit numbering system
LA — Load Allocation
MEG — Model Evaluation Group
MOS — Margin of Safety
MS4 — municipal separate storm sewer systems
Ni — Nickel
N.J.A.C. —New Jersey Administrative Code
NJPDES — New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NJR — New Jersey Register
NPS — Nonpoint Source
PCB — Polychlorinated Biphenyls
QAPP — Quality Assurance Project Plan
RC — Reserve Capacity
SWQS — Surface Water Quality Standards
TC — Total Coliform
TMDL — Total Maximum Daily Load
TP — Total Phosphorus
TSS — Total Suspended Solids
USEPA — United States Environmental Protection Agency
VOC — Volatile Organic Compounds
WLA — Wasteload Allocation
WMA — Watershed Management Area
WPP — Watershed Protection Plan
WRP — Watershed Restoration Plan
WWTP — Wastewater Treatment Plant
WQMP — Water Quality Management Plan

Questions? Comments?

Helen Pang: 609-292-7760